Page 1 of 1

tuning question - mass gain vs AMU gain

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:47 am
by tangaloomaflyer
Can anyone tell me what is the difference between mass gain and mass offset versus AMU gain and AMU offset?

Re: tuning question - mass gain vs AMU gain

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:44 pm
by jerole
Amu gain and offset are parameters that affect the mass peak width, while mass gain and offset are parameters that affect the mass axis calibration.

Re: tuning question - mass gain vs AMU gain

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 8:31 pm
by James_Ball
Amu gain and offset are parameters that affect the mass peak width, while mass gain and offset are parameters that affect the mass axis calibration.
I believe the Gain changes the high mass faster than the low mass and the Offset changes them at equal amounts. Of course I could have that backwards but that is the difference between gain and offset.

Re: tuning question - mass gain vs AMU gain

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 5:58 am
by tangaloomaflyer
Thanks for the replies.

I understand the difference between gain and offset - as James stated, on the Mathieu stability diagram, gain increases the slope of the scan line and offset increases the y-axis intercept.

I see how this affects peak width and resolution, but I'm not sure what the mass axis calibration is all about

Re: tuning question - mass gain vs AMU gain

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 8:23 am
by jerole
The mass axis calibration converts your experimentally measured intensity-time signal into intensity-m/z plot in order to obtain an accurate mass determination of the ions in the mass spec.

Re: tuning question - mass gain vs AMU gain

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 7:33 pm
by James_Ball
Thanks for the replies.

I understand the difference between gain and offset - as James stated, on the Mathieu stability diagram, gain increases the slope of the scan line and offset increases the y-axis intercept.

I see how this affects peak width and resolution, but I'm not sure what the mass axis calibration is all about
It makes an ion at 218.6m/z move to 219.0 m/z to correct the mass assignment.

Re: tuning question - mass gain vs AMU gain

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 2:10 am
by tangaloomaflyer
Thanks James and Jerole - I think I get it now

So increasing the gain of the mass axis calibration will 'stretch' the m/z axis to fit the time axis optimally, and offset will shunt it along.