-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 11:00 pm
Thanks for any suggestions.
Advertisement
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
No, I think GC is a better choice. If you "must" have hexadecane in your matrix, if me I'd try diluting/disssolving all in DMF, keep your column type as it is.Would LC be a better choice?
No, I think GC is a better choice. If you "must" have hexadecane in your matrix, if me I'd try diluting/disssolving all in DMF, keep your column type as it is.Would LC be a better choice?
We've used hexadecane successfully as solvent when assaying high-boiling paraffins.
No.So you are inferring that Hexadecane will cause issue with quantification?
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.