Advertisement

Suitable GC method for detecting hexanol and acetic acid

Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.

5 posts Page 1 of 1
Hello,

I am quite new to use GC, therefore my knowledge here is pretty limited :shock: .
We use a method to quantify hexanol and acetic acid in ethanol. With this method we can detect concentrations of 2 ppm (µg/ml) for hexanol / of 13 ppm (µg/ml) for acetic acid or higher. Apperently the concentrations of our samples are lower than these values, since we don't see anything. Now we wonder if it is possible to enhance the method.

Our method is:

1. GC 6890 with FID
2. Column Innowax (polar)
3. Injection: 1 µl
4. Inlet: splitless @ 220°C, purge time 1 minute, Helium
5. Oven: 60°C up to 220°C mit 10 K/min

Any suggestion to do it better are higly appreciated.
Try large volume injection, you will need some packing in your inlet liner, deactivated glass wool is about as good as anything, look up Focus Liners.

The sharper the peaks the lower the LOD / LOQ, so use the highest carrier gas velocity you can work with. If you are not already using it, switch to hydrogen as carrier gas.

Peter
Peter Apps
With this method we can detect concentrations of 2 ppm (µg/ml) for hexanol / of 13 ppm (µg/ml) for acetic acid or higher. Apperently the concentrations of our samples are lower than these values, since we don't see anything.

I just have to ask: since these levels are so low, why is it important to "know".

Tough to define "zero".
Try large volume injection, you will need some packing in your inlet liner, deactivated glass wool is about as good as anything, look up Focus Liners.

The sharper the peaks the lower the LOD / LOQ, so use the highest carrier gas velocity you can work with. If you are not already using it, switch to hydrogen as carrier gas.
Thank you for your replay. I will try that!

I just have to ask: since these levels are so low, why is it important to "know".

Tough to define "zero".

That is a good question. The samples were taken out of production trials, where different process settings were used. In order to have a correlation between settings and concetration of these chemicals you need signals. No signal is good, having signals is better, than you know which direction for the settings is better. :)
5 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 171 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 170 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 170 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry