-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 5:52 pm
Advertisement
Need help with CO2 analysis using a TCD
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
3 posts
Page 1 of 1
I'm using an old, local make of Thermo Scientific GC (Chemito 8610) with a SS Porapack Q column (3m) and a TCD to measure CO2 from lake water samples using headspace equilibration technique. The expected range of CO2 values is 100-5000 ppm. I tried using methanator/FID but was getting erratic values at higher concentrations. Was asked to switch to a TCD. Have been trying to optimize the TCD with different combinations of oven, detector, injector (packed) temperatures and carrier (ultrapure helium) flow rates, but all I'm getting is a beautiful and huge peak for nitrogen (my calibration standards are CO2-N2 mix) followed by a tiny peak (that too only in some cases) which I'm not sure belongs to CO2 or not. Also, the area of the tiny peak does show any linearity with increasing concentrations of CO2. I'm using four standards - 100 ppm, 1000 ppm, 2500 ppm, 5000 ppm. So I badly need help to find out what I'm doing wrong and how best to optimize this method. I'm new to this (as is probably evident from my description) so kindly be gentle. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:40 am
What gas is used for carrier gas ? You can change to N2 as carrier and the huge peak will disappear.
-
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:33 pm
gurjotbmc,
You are probably near the detection limit for your TCD (depending on your loop size) at the 100 ppm level but the other levels should start to be linear. Next question I would ask is how you are sampling and what column you are using.
I would not advise switching to nitrogen as a carrier because you will loose a ton of sensitivity, to the point where you might not see even the 1000 standard.
Finally, have you considered HID?
Best regards,
AICMM
You are probably near the detection limit for your TCD (depending on your loop size) at the 100 ppm level but the other levels should start to be linear. Next question I would ask is how you are sampling and what column you are using.
I would not advise switching to nitrogen as a carrier because you will loose a ton of sensitivity, to the point where you might not see even the 1000 standard.
Finally, have you considered HID?
Best regards,
AICMM
3 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 129 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 128 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 128 guests
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 128 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
