Oh no! New Greenhouse Gas, bad for GCMS operators
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 8:50 pm
Well I just saw a news blurb today that says a study has discovered that PFTBA is a stronger greenhouse gas than CO2. I guess we better be careful how long we leave our calibration valves open or all the glaciers will melt 
http://www.livescience.com/41914-greenh ... hange.html
Quote from the article I found amusing;
"For the study, the researchers collected atmospheric data from November 2012 to December 2012, and measured the proportion of PFTBA in the atmosphere at 0.18 parts per trillion. This means that for every 1 trillion air molecules, less than a full molecule of PFTBA is present."
Wouldn't that be less than 1/5 of a full molecule is present per 1 trillion air molecules? And what is a "full" molecule of PFTBA? Non-Science types make me chuckle sometimes.
http://www.livescience.com/41914-greenh ... hange.html
Quote from the article I found amusing;
"For the study, the researchers collected atmospheric data from November 2012 to December 2012, and measured the proportion of PFTBA in the atmosphere at 0.18 parts per trillion. This means that for every 1 trillion air molecules, less than a full molecule of PFTBA is present."
Wouldn't that be less than 1/5 of a full molecule is present per 1 trillion air molecules? And what is a "full" molecule of PFTBA? Non-Science types make me chuckle sometimes.