ECD vent lines?
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 8:51 pm
Per the Agilent GC-ECD installation guide:
"Venting your ECD
The instrument in which the ECD is mounted must be placed where the ECD effluent can be vented. The ECD shall not be vented into the laboratory environment. A vent line to a fume hood is a convenient way to accomplish this. This precaution is taken to avoid radioactive contamination of the laboratory if an abnormal condition should occur. Agilent Technologies recommends a vent line running to a fume hood. The inside diameter should be 6 mm (1/4 inch) or greater to prevent back pressure which might cause noise in the ECD signal. With a line of this diameter, the length of the tubing is not critical."
How (or does) your laboratory follow this guideline? I have seen a Restek part where they have plumbed in what looks like a carbon trap http://www.restek.com/catalog/view/3174 - has anyone used this or something similar? Any thoughts on which is the more appropriate approach?
"Venting your ECD
The instrument in which the ECD is mounted must be placed where the ECD effluent can be vented. The ECD shall not be vented into the laboratory environment. A vent line to a fume hood is a convenient way to accomplish this. This precaution is taken to avoid radioactive contamination of the laboratory if an abnormal condition should occur. Agilent Technologies recommends a vent line running to a fume hood. The inside diameter should be 6 mm (1/4 inch) or greater to prevent back pressure which might cause noise in the ECD signal. With a line of this diameter, the length of the tubing is not critical."
How (or does) your laboratory follow this guideline? I have seen a Restek part where they have plumbed in what looks like a carbon trap http://www.restek.com/catalog/view/3174 - has anyone used this or something similar? Any thoughts on which is the more appropriate approach?