Advertisement

which type of UV detector is best for quantification

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

7 posts Page 1 of 1
i was told that it is fixed wavelength? What is the problem with variable wavelength UV detector or PDA?
Historically fixed wavelength detectors used transition lines, as such the wavelength accuracy was second to none; variable or DAD systems have to use a mechanical system to disperse the radiation so there is always the potential for mis-allignment.

Almost all modern DAD instruments re-calibrate every time the power is cycled so this is no longer a significant concern in most labs. A wavelength check is still useful for variable systems but in reality if a suitable wavelength was chosen when the method was defined (not near a sharp absorbance change or a highly pH sensitive area of the spectrum) you will be comparing standards with analytes and as such a small long term change will not impact on the results.
I didn't know that fixed-wavelength detectors were still being made.....I've been doing HPLC over 30 years and never have used one...
i was told that it is fixed wavelength?
Whoever told you that probably also thinks the most economical mode of transportation is a horse (the gas mileage is great!).

Even if one were still commercially available, a fixed wavelength detector would be the best choice only if two conditions were met:
- your compound has an absorbance maximum at or near the wavelength of the detector (most commonly, 254 nm)
- your compound has an absorbance spectrum with a lot of structure, such that spectral resolution is important (in fact, the solution spectra of most compounds shows very little fine structure).
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
The small addition I will make is that the photodiode array detector typically will be less sensitive than a variable wavelength detector. That said, on the newest instruments, differences in sensitivity between photodiode array and variable wavelength detectors are getting much smaller due to the use of "light pipes" and other advances in detector optics design.
MattM
Thanks so much!!! i really appreciate your help. this is the forum I heavy rely on.
The small addition I will make is that the photodiode array detector typically will be less sensitive than a variable wavelength detector. That said, on the newest instruments, differences in sensitivity between photodiode array and variable wavelength detectors are getting much smaller due to the use of "light pipes" and other advances in detector optics design.
When I see a publication or application with detector wavelength of 254nm, or using an internal standard when one would not seem necessary, that's a prime indicator of an old procedure developed on a fixed wavelength detector or using manual injection respectively.
7 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 2 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry