HPLC-ECD method for Neomycin Sulfate
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:23 pm
Currently I am trying to measure Neomycin Sulfate and it's related compound according to Ph.Eur.
My problem with the Ph.Eur is the mobile phase in combination with the used column.
Mobile phase: 20 ml TFA, 6 ml NaOH (50%) ad. to 1000.0 ml with water (pH = 1.1)
The mobile phase is brought to a higher pH value by post column addition of a 0.5 M NaOH solution, since oxidation (in the ECD cell) does not take place at such low pH values.
My guess is that the low pH value is chosen to prevent auto-oxidation of the Neomycin before the post column.
On the "knowledge base" on the EDQM site I found the column used for the monograph is a Hypersil BDS 250 x 4.6 mm 5 um
According to column vendors, this column has a pH range of 2 - 7. According to EDQM, this monograph is being reviewed because this method is quite aggresive for both HPLC system and column.
I tried separation with a GraceSmart C18 but destroyed one column using pH 1 mobile phase.
Now I brought the pH of the mobile phase to 3.0, separation of two neomycine peaks (B and C) is good (resolution 2.3) but the reproducability is quite bad (RSD% = 6 (n = 6)). I think this poor reproducability is caused by the slightly higher pH value of the mobile phase.
Maybe someone on this forum is more familiar with ECD detection and/or Neomycin sulfate acc. Ph. Eur?
And is willing to share some thoughts on this matter.
I found a lot of info here:
http://www.myantec.com/download.php?fil ... RydWcucGRm
My problem with the Ph.Eur is the mobile phase in combination with the used column.
Mobile phase: 20 ml TFA, 6 ml NaOH (50%) ad. to 1000.0 ml with water (pH = 1.1)
The mobile phase is brought to a higher pH value by post column addition of a 0.5 M NaOH solution, since oxidation (in the ECD cell) does not take place at such low pH values.
My guess is that the low pH value is chosen to prevent auto-oxidation of the Neomycin before the post column.
On the "knowledge base" on the EDQM site I found the column used for the monograph is a Hypersil BDS 250 x 4.6 mm 5 um
According to column vendors, this column has a pH range of 2 - 7. According to EDQM, this monograph is being reviewed because this method is quite aggresive for both HPLC system and column.
I tried separation with a GraceSmart C18 but destroyed one column using pH 1 mobile phase.
Now I brought the pH of the mobile phase to 3.0, separation of two neomycine peaks (B and C) is good (resolution 2.3) but the reproducability is quite bad (RSD% = 6 (n = 6)). I think this poor reproducability is caused by the slightly higher pH value of the mobile phase.
Maybe someone on this forum is more familiar with ECD detection and/or Neomycin sulfate acc. Ph. Eur?
And is willing to share some thoughts on this matter.
I found a lot of info here:
http://www.myantec.com/download.php?fil ... RydWcucGRm