Interesting. Restek seems to have been doing a lot of research on medical marijuana, and they have quite a few resources on their website for medical marijuana testing. Depending on how far you want to take your medical marijuana analysis, you may also want to think about pesticide and herbicide residue testing, unless you'll be growing your own and are planning to not use pesticides or herbicides.
http://www.restek.com/sitesearch/site?S ... ton=Search
http://www.restek.com/Reference-Standar ... -Marijuana
http://www.restek.com/Landing-Pages/Medical-Marijuana
http://blog.restek.com/?p=4793
http://www.restek.com/pdfs/GNAD1232-INT.pdf
http://blog.restek.com/?p=3018
As for cost, you can get an HPLC-UV system for anywhere from $2500 to $100k. Go to LabX.com, or look for third-party instrument vendors who sell refurbished systems. As for GCs, the same price points will apply, but I would opt for one with an EPC (electronic pressure control) over an instrument with manual gas flow adjustments, and one with an autoinjector (autosampler). For an HPLC, I would want an autosampler and at least a binary pumping system capable of doing gradient analysis, along with a thermostatted column compartment. Without having used either GC or HPLC in some time, I would opt for a "warrantied" system, or maybe one with an annual preventative maintenance service visit built into the price, and perhaps a familiarization visit included. If you go with an HPLC, Tom Jupille of LC Resources (and this Forum) offers many training courses that would definitely be helpful to you:
http://www.lcresources.com/training/trsched.html
Cost of ownership on a GC versus an LC is questionable. Columns are similarly priced, but GC columns can be cut shorter and shorter while an LC column cannot. GCs have inlet maintenance supplies that are usually replaced much more frequently than on an HPLC. I have no idea what high purity gas costs, but a case of HPLC grade methanol can cost $250-$500 US for 16 liters, and acetonitrile can go for $500-$1000 for the same amount. HPLCs will generate solvent waste that needs to be properly disposed of, while a GC will (generally) not. In my opinion, HPLCs are definitely more for the mechanically apt, and if that isn't you, I would stick with GC. I think accuracy of either technique should be similar, and with a well-maintained instrument and a well-developed analytical method, the precision will depend more on the operator than the instrument.
but is there a way to automate the sampling input, testing, and results output?
For the sampling, there is probably a lot you would need to do to get a sample ready for processing, so this may be an exceptionally manual process. The instruments, however, once loaded with sample extracts and reference standards, should be able to run autonomously via the instrument control software. Once the data from the analysis has been acquired, the processing of the data can be accomplished with one of several different data processing platforms. A nice little chromatography acquisition and analysis software platform I've used is called ChromPerfect by Justice Innovations.
http://www.chromperfect.com/index.htm
You've probably already considered this, but you'll also need the generic suite of lab supplies, like computers, printers, gloves, lab coats, fume hoods, organic solvents, refrigerators, freezers, glassware, pipettes, balances, micro syringes, solvent cabinets, solvent waste drums, vials, vial caps, etc. VWR has a new lab setup program that may or may not be useful to you:
https://us.vwr.com/store/content/extern ... d_save.jsp
https://us.vwr.com/us.vwr.com/en_US/ima ... graphy.pdf
Hope this helps. I would probably shoot for $100k US just to get a small lab up and running, because the instrument for the analysis is just a small part of what you'll need to do quality work.