Page 1 of 1
Chuckle
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 10:38 am
by Peter Apps
From the literature :
Additionally, MHC-distinctiveness of urine odors in a Y-maze is retained
even after volatiles have been trapped on solid-phase fibers
and passed through a gas chromatographer
Peter
Re: Chuckle
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:27 pm
by Yama001
Well, as long as it is billable ...
Re: Chuckle
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:42 pm
by Steve Reimer
Is this fragrance chemistry? I hear the human nose is a reliable detector. A dog nose is more sensitive but the interface with the Chromatography Data System is problematic!
Peter’s true work is exposed. He is working on the next celebrity perfume, “Go Wild” with “base notes of wild dog and just a hint of cheetah in the bouquet” for those times when your boundaries are limitless!
Re: Chuckle
Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:35 pm
by chromatographer1
But are any additional "MHC-distinctiveness of urine odors" found from passing through the chromatographer?
Does the age or sex of the chromatographer make a difference.... or the amount of education or degree level of the chromatographer have a bearing on the results, or the diet of the chromatographer?
Who would have thought such research is being performed today. We do live in special times.
Now, what's for lunch?
Rod
Re: Chuckle
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:02 am
by Peter Apps
Is this fragrance chemistry? I hear the human nose is a reliable detector. A dog nose is more sensitive but the interface with the Chromatography Data System is problematic!
Peter’s true work is exposed. He is working on the next celebrity perfume, “Go Wild” with “base notes of wild dog and just a hint of cheetah in the bouquet” for those times when your boundaries are limitless!
Dammit, busted !!
Peter