Advertisement

Can hypercarb dry out

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

6 posts Page 1 of 1
Hi,

I have lurked around these forums for a while but never posted. I did do a search and read as many threads as I could but I can't seem to find info on this problem. I am using a hypercarb column, heated at 60C. Mobile is water and 50% ACN. I am separating oligosaccharides. I had a method that was working beautifully to separate my substrate from my products. Anyway, I was sharing my HPLC with another lab and the other guy (I swear) took my column off to put his on. He left it in the heater, with no column plugs. I thought that the column would be fine given the nature of the packing, but now I am getting very little or no retention. Any thoughts?

Thanks!
I assume that the aswer is, Yes!
I would not expect that an open column held at 60 °C would show perfect chromatograms.
Dr. Markus Laeubli
Manager Marketing Support IC
(retired)
Metrohm AG
9101 Herisau
Switzerland
I wasn't expecting perfection, but hoped for usability. I guess I figured that since you can buy almost the same packing in a dry SPE cartridge that it might be ok.
The dry SPE cartridges are typically conditioned with methanol then flushed with water prior to use.

The other possibility is that the packing reacted with the residual solvent when it dried out.
I would try washing the column with methanol or acetonitrile (or another organic solvent) and trying it again. I note this is porous graphite (not C18) so it may not run properly again.

Off topic, I've heard that columns are ruined if they are allowed to dry out, but SFC columns use carbon dioxide as one of the solvents. Removing those columns can let the carbon dioxide escape- hasn't the column then dried out? SFC columns still seem to run fine when used again. Any thoughts on this? Thanks!
Thanks for the suggestion. I did almost exactly that last night. I ran acetonitrile for about 3h, then H2O for about 6h then tried some standards and all appears to be ok for the sugars I am using. The retention times are about as consistent as they were in the past and my sugar appears to be totally retained (collected flow-through doesn't show anything by MS). As per usual the column does not seem to tolerate relatively fast gradients (changes of more than 1%/min do bad things to the baseline), but that was true before this happened.
6 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 34 users online :: 3 registered, 0 hidden and 31 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Prabhu1 and 31 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry