Advertisement

Caffeine and paraxanthine in plasma

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

3 posts Page 1 of 1
I found a paper which precipitates the protein using perchloric acid. The author claims it works so well that there's no need for an internal standard. Is this common practice?

I still intend on doing % recovery... run a standard and also process some blank plasma spiked with the same concentration, and compare the two of those.
Internal standards are a mixed blessing. They can cancel out correlated errors, but they excerbate independent (uncorrelated) errors. Since you have two peaks, a simple test is to look at the ratio of the areas. If the precision of the ratio is better than that of the areas, then an internal standard will help. If the areas look better than the ratios, then an internal standard will hurt.
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
If you're using MS detection and NOT using a stable labeled version of your analyte as an internal standard then you'll have to run a spike of each sample since matrix effects are highly sample dependent.
A. Carl Sanchez
3 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 357 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 356 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 356 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry