by
Kristof » Fri Jun 01, 2012 8:30 am
I'm not an expert either but I can give you few generic remarks:
1. LC-MS of intact protein would give you only m/z which can be used to calculate MW by deconvolution but is not specific enough for identification.
2. LC-MS/MS of intact protein would give you some details on structure and sequence. I think this kind of information can be used for database search.
3. Digestion with specific agent (chemical or enzyme) followed by LC-MS or LC-MS/MS may give you a lot of information on primary structure of your protein. For determining primary structure of new protein it may be required to digest with at least two different agents to get two series of sequences which can be arranged in proper order.
-Recommended column and column size
C18 (there's a lot of them) or C12 (eg. Jupiter Proteo from Phenomenex). Narrow bore would increase ESI response.
-recommended buffers
A: <0.1% formic acid or TFA in water
B: <0.1% formic acid or TFA in acetonitrile or methanol
TFA - less tailing, more supression of ionisation
FA - other way around
-recommended ul/min
As low as possible to increase ESI response.
Info: We have done 2D gels with silver staining
Not recommended, unless you have used some very special MS-compatible silver stain. (In this case I want manufacturer name and catalogue number or full protocol.

) If not - use colloidal coomassie instead eg. "blue silver" or similar.