Advertisement

HIC using C4 RP-HPLC column??

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

3 posts Page 1 of 1
Hi ,

I would appreciate it if anyone knows whether I can use C4 RP-HPLC column for Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) analysis of proteins with fluorescence detector.

Zahra
My guess is that it would be too hydrophobic. C4 ligands are used in HIC columns, but well spaced among hydrophilic groups. If Andy Alpert checks in, he should be able to answer that more accurately (hint, hint!).
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
Hard to resist Tom's invocation...

This approach has been tried before. So has the reverse arrangement: Using a material designed for HIC in the reversed-phase mode [ref: R.H. Ingraham et al., J. Chromatogr. 327 (1985) 77-92]. The arrangement you propose doesn't work well. The reason is that C-4 coatings have alkyl- groups packed closely together. As Tom points out, coatings designed for HIC generally feature moderately hydrophobic ligands (phenyl-; propyl-) attached to a reasonably hydrophilic backbone polymer and the unit cells tend to be large, resulting in a low density of the hydrophobic ligand on the surface. This arrangement works well for intact proteins, which is the application that one normally uses HIC for. The conditions tend to preserve protein tertiary structure (unless it's a subunit protein in which the subunits are associated through electrostatic attraction, which is disrupted by the high salt concentrations). The intact proteins cover so much area on the surface that there are enough hydrophobic ligands available for adequate retention even if they're sparsely distributed; it doesn't make a lot of difference if the protein is sitting on top of 4 such ligands or 14. By contrast, small solutes with hydrophobic character can line up with the ligands one on one, and ligand density makes a big difference. While it's possible to separate small peptides via HIC (A.J. Alpert, J. Chromatogr. 444 (1988) 269-274), peaks are wider and backpressure's higher than with reversed-phase.

Getting back to your question: It would be appreciably more difficult to get an intact protein to elute from a C-4 material. The necessary conditions might cause the loss of its tertiary structure. That in turn would expose all the hydrophobic residues that are sequestered in the core of the normal structure. They could bind to the surface in numerous alternative orientations, each with a different degree of affinity and eluting at different points in the gradient. Result: a peak 15 minutes wide. There are reasons why it's been necessary to develop alternatives to reversed-phase for protein chromatography.
PolyLC Inc.
(410) 992-5400
aalpert@polylc.com
3 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 24 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 22 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 22 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry