Hi Edde; indeed I believe MAX is a better option. 80% is not the best but is not bad either.
I have many Ideas but I do not know if I could be helpfull.
Could you plese describe your MAX procedure?
I believe that the differences between aqueous STD and urine spike could be due to the ionic strengh among other reasons; uirine have many anions that could be saturating (partially) your cartridge so recovery in urine is lower??
What Nitrite level are you expecting see? if you do not have sencitivity limitations you could use another approach; for example use MCX or C18 in such a way that when you load your sample you retain neutrals and cations and allow anions to pass; doing this way you eliminate many interference but you can't concentrate your sample.
Could you describe your HPLC method? what column and detector are you using?
I do not know if 1:1 dilution for the buffer is fine; this depends of the buffer capacity; I would say that 1:1 is more to enough but I do not have any fundament for that statement; you will have to try with many urins samples as you can. I wonder why pH of 7.5? why not 8 or 9? I am just concern about possible saturation of the cartridge due to high concentration of phosphate.
did I sent you this article before?
http://chromatographyonline.findanalyti ... rticle.pdf
If you can't use your column for IPC then you could concider buy a new column for this.
I think I haven't been too much usefull maybe if you send the rest of the information or any one else can help.
I hope soon I will start a project of analyzing sugar in urine samples and as I can see youw work with this can of matrix I would like to have your contact; my email is:
oscar.cortesledezma@gmail.com
good look and best Regards.
Oscar.