Advertisement

Column Selectivity Comparison: USP vs. PQRI databases

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

2 posts Page 1 of 1
Hi All,

I'm interested to hear which version people prefer when trying to find similar or disimilar (re: maximum selectivity space for method development) columns for their work.

Both databases are listed here: http://www.usp.org/USPNF/columnsDB.html

I must admit I have a preference for using the PQRI database, if only that it is much more comprehensive (525 phases vs. 112 for the USP database).

Has anyone compared the two approaches directly in the literature for either 1) selecting equivalent columns or 2) selecting the biggest selectivity space?
The topic and methods of the PQRI database has been covered extensively in the literature since around 2003. Search for Hydrophobic-subtraction model; most of the articles I know of are located in the Journal of Chromatography A.
2 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 12 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 11 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 11 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry