-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:27 pm
Advertisement
SAX vs WAX
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
4 posts
Page 1 of 1
All else equal, under what circumstances would one choose a WAX over SAX for protein/peptide separation? If the pH is held constant (below pKa of WAX) and an increasing salt gradient used, are these two columns the same?
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:11 am
Do you mean LC or just cartridge purification?
Don’t forget that this is not an “ideal gas”. I mean it is not just charge attached to nothing. There is a support Si or polymer that also contribute to separation of analyte and rubbish. And there is always a manufacturer/ batch quality/consistency/impurities behind the product. With WAX you have more options as quaternary amines are always charged.
Don’t forget that this is not an “ideal gas”. I mean it is not just charge attached to nothing. There is a support Si or polymer that also contribute to separation of analyte and rubbish. And there is always a manufacturer/ batch quality/consistency/impurities behind the product. With WAX you have more options as quaternary amines are always charged.
"If your experiment needs statistics, you ought to have done a better experiment." Rutherford
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:27 pm
HPLC
I understand WAX could become uncharged when the pH is increased... I just don't see a lot of folks running linear pH gradients these days. The SAX column, on the other hand, has broader pH range. You seemingly could drop the pH and elute peptides, proteins from SAX as easily as WAX. All other things equal (assume polymeric support chemistry is same), I don't see why one would prefer WAX over SAX.
SCX vs WCX I get...- But WAX vs SAX confuses me
I understand WAX could become uncharged when the pH is increased... I just don't see a lot of folks running linear pH gradients these days. The SAX column, on the other hand, has broader pH range. You seemingly could drop the pH and elute peptides, proteins from SAX as easily as WAX. All other things equal (assume polymeric support chemistry is same), I don't see why one would prefer WAX over SAX.
SCX vs WCX I get...- But WAX vs SAX confuses me
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:28 pm
DJ -
You are correct that a WAX material loses charge density in a continuum from pH 5 to pH 9.5. SAX materials retain their charge density over that range. Now, one reason to prefer a WAX material is that the additional alkyl- groups that are attached to a SAX ligand increase its hydrophobic character. That's significant in many biological applications; recovery of delicate proteins is sometimes affected by hydrophobic character of a stationary phase. Above pH 8 a WAX material has decidedly less charge than a SAX material. That said, you wouldn't use an ordinary silica-based material above pH 8 anyway, so it's a moot point unless you're using an anion-exchange material based on a polymeric material or an inorganic material such as titania or zirconia. Those should be avoided if you can help it; peaks tend to be a lot wider on such materials than with a good silica-based material.
Do you have a specific application in mind that would be conducted at a pH > 8?
You are correct that a WAX material loses charge density in a continuum from pH 5 to pH 9.5. SAX materials retain their charge density over that range. Now, one reason to prefer a WAX material is that the additional alkyl- groups that are attached to a SAX ligand increase its hydrophobic character. That's significant in many biological applications; recovery of delicate proteins is sometimes affected by hydrophobic character of a stationary phase. Above pH 8 a WAX material has decidedly less charge than a SAX material. That said, you wouldn't use an ordinary silica-based material above pH 8 anyway, so it's a moot point unless you're using an anion-exchange material based on a polymeric material or an inorganic material such as titania or zirconia. Those should be avoided if you can help it; peaks tend to be a lot wider on such materials than with a good silica-based material.
Do you have a specific application in mind that would be conducted at a pH > 8?
4 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 4 users online :: 3 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], dwi6662025, Google [Bot] and 1 guest
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], dwi6662025, Google [Bot] and 1 guest
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science