Page 1 of 1
Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 2:26 pm
by LC_addict
Hi guys,
I have a method. Not created by any of our team which requires the use of Indirect UV detection at the wavelength of 240nm.
Now i don't have any knowledge on Indirect-UV. can anyone give me a quick outline or guide to what it is?
Can my agilent 1100/1200 equipped with DAD run this type of method?
Column required is a IC-Pak A HR, 6 μm, 75 x 4.6 mm or equivalent . All suitable with our systems?
Cheers again guys..!
Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 3:11 pm
by Consumer Products Guy
Mobile phase contains a UV-active modifier, and when your ion exhanges with it the UV signal drops, so you get a negative peak. We don't use it, we use conductivity detector for ions.
Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 3:22 pm
by LC_addict
So this mean...?!
I can use the normal set -up and DAD detector that we currently have?!
Thanks for the reply by the way

Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 4:28 pm
by tom jupille
Yes, you can use the DAD. The major difference is that your peaks will be negative (you're looking at a decrease in absorbance), so you will have to flip the polarity.
Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 4:32 am
by stev434
Some CDSs include an option to use indirect absorbance such as EZChrom and 32Karat. You might want to check to see if this is possible
Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 8:57 pm
by Kostas Petritis
There are some nice papers written back in the 80's (I think Jack Crommen worked a lot on it).
Not an easy route, very susceptible to get "system peaks".
Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 4:32 pm
by bgranot
Hi guys,
I have a method. Not created by any of our team which requires the use of Indirect UV detection at the wavelength of 240nm.
Now i don't have any knowledge on Indirect-UV. can anyone give me a quick outline or guide to what it is?
Can my agilent 1100/1200 equipped with DAD run this type of method?
Column required is a IC-Pak A HR, 6 μm, 75 x 4.6 mm or equivalent . All suitable with our systems?
Cheers again guys..!
Indirect UV usualy means using another standard the apear at different retantion time with a known absortivity ratio to the analyte you are looking to analyze quatitatively.
A good example of it is using Vitamin A acetate to quatitate Vitamin A Palmitate.
USP standard for Vitamin A palmitate is not available.
I hope this is understood.

Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 8:28 pm
by zokitano
Hi guys,
I have a method. Not created by any of our team which requires the use of Indirect UV detection at the wavelength of 240nm.
Now i don't have any knowledge on Indirect-UV. can anyone give me a quick outline or guide to what it is?
Can my agilent 1100/1200 equipped with DAD run this type of method?
Column required is a IC-Pak A HR, 6 μm, 75 x 4.6 mm or equivalent . All suitable with our systems?
Cheers again guys..!
Indirect UV usualy means using another standard the apear at different retantion time with a known absortivity ratio to the analyte you are looking to analyze quatitatively.
A good example of it is using Vitamin A acetate to quatitate Vitamin A Palmitate.
USP standard for Vitamin A palmitate is not available.
I hope this is understood.

Please, carefully read the original post and the replies before you post your opinion.
Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 6:02 am
by Kazimierz
Indirect method of detection means, that substance is modyfied before detector:
1. derivatization
2. UV irridation
3. Ion-pair forming
Direct detection - native oryginal molecule is measured.
The most frequent is for fluorimetry, but UV or VIS also used for the sensitivity,
specifity, or separation parameters improving.
If you have complete method 'indirect' is only for you information, not for any
extra manipulate with detector.
Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 9:22 am
by HW Mueller
Well, I always thought that this term was reserved for the technique that uses a light absorbing mobile phase for analytes which don´t absorb light. When the analyte comes through the mobile phase is diluted, the absorbance goes down, a negative peak results, as mentioned before. I never used that, seen it many times when shorter wavelength were used.
Re: Indirect UV?!?! Help..!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 3:38 pm
by tom jupille