-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:04 pm
Advertisement
looking for suggestions on packed column phase
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
10 posts
Page 1 of 1
I am performing analysis of lubricants formulated from animal and vegetable oils using a gc/FID with a packed column. My current column phase is 3% Dexsil 300. My problem is that, compared to most of the oils we have, the column is relatively insensitive to the highly refined peanut oil that is a key component of one of our manufacturing processes. Can anyone suggest a different phase or setup that would be more sensitive to refined peanut oil?
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:04 am
What do you mean by insensitive? Also can you give a bit mroe information about the GC conditions?
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:28 pm
You are using a polycarboranesiloxane packing which allows extremely high temperatures and in your case the elution of triglycerides.
You might change your analysis to the determination of fatty acid content but that will be a drastic change. You don't want to do that I would guess.
PDMS phases don't tolerate the temperatures you are using, not for long anyway.
I do not know any phase better suited to your purpose as you are doing the analysis presently.
Size exclusion LC might be a solution but then you will lose the history of your analysis comparisons.
Good luck,
Rod
You might change your analysis to the determination of fatty acid content but that will be a drastic change. You don't want to do that I would guess.
PDMS phases don't tolerate the temperatures you are using, not for long anyway.
I do not know any phase better suited to your purpose as you are doing the analysis presently.
Size exclusion LC might be a solution but then you will lose the history of your analysis comparisons.
Good luck,
Rod
-
- Posts: 3594
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:43 pm
We use metal (not fused silica) capillaries for triglycerides, designed for large molecules and high temperatures. See Quadrex, Phenomenex
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:28 pm
But CPG
I remind you that I said "PDMS phases don't tolerate the temperatures you are using, not for long anyway."
There may be issues of sample decomposition with the matrix and the temperatures which I can suppose but which he has not disclosed.
I suspect we are talking about temperatures in excess of 400°C. PDMS chemistry does not tolerate these temperatures for any length of time without being destroyed.
best wishes,
ROd
I remind you that I said "PDMS phases don't tolerate the temperatures you are using, not for long anyway."
There may be issues of sample decomposition with the matrix and the temperatures which I can suppose but which he has not disclosed.
I suspect we are talking about temperatures in excess of 400°C. PDMS chemistry does not tolerate these temperatures for any length of time without being destroyed.
best wishes,
ROd
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:04 pm
More Information:
The maximum temperature my column sees is 395 C.
Thre are no peaks evident after 300 C.
I am not nearly as knowledgeable about GC as I would like to be. The comments I have seen already are helpful.
I have the hardware to switch to a direct injection capillary column. If there are some good options there, I would like to know what they might be as well.
The maximum temperature my column sees is 395 C.
Thre are no peaks evident after 300 C.
I am not nearly as knowledgeable about GC as I would like to be. The comments I have seen already are helpful.
I have the hardware to switch to a direct injection capillary column. If there are some good options there, I would like to know what they might be as well.
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:28 pm
Most PDMS phases are limited to 360° and if temperatures above that are encountered they degrade.
Si-O-Si-Me bonds have a temperature limit.
Capillary columns are sample size limited before overload conditions are reached. I would suggest 5-15 meter lengths and about 0.15 µ film thickness for minimum coverage of the fused silica surface.
Packed columns are CHEAPER, last longer with impure samples, and have much larger sample loading capacity.
This may translate to lower detection levels or it may not. It may be the sharper peaks seen with capillary columns more than compensate for the smaller sample capacity, or not.
I believe there are vendors who have the carborane phase columns. I have no recommendations as far as if they are suitable for your application.
good luck with your work,
Rod
Si-O-Si-Me bonds have a temperature limit.
Capillary columns are sample size limited before overload conditions are reached. I would suggest 5-15 meter lengths and about 0.15 µ film thickness for minimum coverage of the fused silica surface.
Packed columns are CHEAPER, last longer with impure samples, and have much larger sample loading capacity.
This may translate to lower detection levels or it may not. It may be the sharper peaks seen with capillary columns more than compensate for the smaller sample capacity, or not.
I believe there are vendors who have the carborane phase columns. I have no recommendations as far as if they are suitable for your application.
good luck with your work,
Rod
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:04 am
What inlet temperature are you running? You will not see much elute above your inlet temperature.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:04 pm
My injection port is set at 300 C., FID detector at 200 C. The manufacturer says that the Dexsil phase I am using has a max temperature of 400 C which I do not believe I have exceeded. I did condition the column at 395 C prior to use.
-
- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 7:28 pm
I would increase the FID to 300°C if not 350°C
I have heard of folks using 425 as a max limit but follow your vendor's recommendation.
If you have any oxygen in your carrier you will (or already have) damage your phase and make it reactive to the triglycerides, which can cause their peaks to disappear.
Good luck,
Rod
I have heard of folks using 425 as a max limit but follow your vendor's recommendation.
If you have any oxygen in your carrier you will (or already have) damage your phase and make it reactive to the triglycerides, which can cause their peaks to disappear.
Good luck,
Rod
10 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 16 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 14 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 14 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 14 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
