HPLC+RI Detector for Sugar Separation
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:51 pm
I'm in an undergrad quantitative analysis course and we just recently created standard curves of fructose, glucose, and sucrose through HPLC with an RI detector. Our lap does not say what our stationary phase is (although it mentions sugars will be separated by charge/polarity). Our mobile phase was acetonitrile:water 80:20, so I assume this is reverse phase LC.
We ran 3 different concentrations of each sugar and then ran an unknown. We're supposed to construct a standard curve, but my chromatogram has 2 peaks for each standard.
-Will our mobile phase generate a peak on the chromatogram? We made our mobile phase that we used to dilute our samples, if we made a slight concentration difference in the mobile phase, would a peak appear?
-I read in another post that anomers create the two peaks, but does sucrose have an anomer?
I noticed that the line between sucrose peaks hits the baseline, while fructose and glucose do not...
I just have no idea how to analyze this and generate my standard curve (if only one peak represents my sugar, which peak do I choose?)
I'm aware of over injection of sample, and column void space, but I doubt either of those are creating the problem...
We ran 3 different concentrations of each sugar and then ran an unknown. We're supposed to construct a standard curve, but my chromatogram has 2 peaks for each standard.
-Will our mobile phase generate a peak on the chromatogram? We made our mobile phase that we used to dilute our samples, if we made a slight concentration difference in the mobile phase, would a peak appear?
-I read in another post that anomers create the two peaks, but does sucrose have an anomer?
I noticed that the line between sucrose peaks hits the baseline, while fructose and glucose do not...
I just have no idea how to analyze this and generate my standard curve (if only one peak represents my sugar, which peak do I choose?)
I'm aware of over injection of sample, and column void space, but I doubt either of those are creating the problem...