by
adam » Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:46 pm
An interesting question. This is one of those issues that seems to go endlessly in circles.
Personally, I would define these terms differently. The ICH guidances on impurities specify a reporting limit (above which values should be reported) and an identification limit (above which an attempt should be made to identify the impurity).
By convention, a specification is generally set at or above the reporting limit (no sense setting a spec below the level at which the agency is interested).
So for impurities which are consistently observed above the reporting limit, but below the identification limit, we would have a specification (hence it is specified) but we would usually not know what it is (hence, it is unidentified). However, for impurity peaks that are not consistently observed above the reporting limit, we would generally not set a spec. So these would be unspecified impurities.
In summary
Specified: Means it has a specification.
Identified: Means we know what it is.
It is a common mistake (at least in my opinion) for people to define 'specified' as known, but I think that's incorrect.
I am curious to hear what others have to say on this topic.
Adam