Poor recovery reproducibility for P&T / EPA 8260
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:45 pm
				
				I've recently inherited a P&T/GC/MS system for running the 8260 compound list and I'm having difficulty getting reproducible recoveries. I'll generate a good calibration curve (%RSD on responses < 15%) one day and within 1-2 days my standard controls begin to fail recovery limits. Typically the internal standard abundances will drop 20-30% and %recoveries jump up to 130-200%. This isn't a standard issue, because I've ran the standards on two other systems with good performance.
Our group has been running the same method on two identical systems (Tekmar 3000 P&T, Agilent 6890 GC, Agilent 5973 MS) without issues for a few years now. The system I'm trying to get this method to work on is (Tekmar 3100 P&T), Agilent 7890 GC, Agilent 5975C MS).
All three systems have VOCARB 3000 traps and Agilent J&W DB624 columns (60m x 0.25mm ID X 1.4um film). The flow is split 50:1
The one systematic trend I find is that the reproducibility is worse for the light compounds, in particular the gases vinyl chloride, chlorethane and trichlorfluoromethane. I would expect a leak would cause gas problems but I am unable to find one. I also find it hard to believe it would cause an increase in recoveries.
Is there something different about the new instruments that might require a significant change in the method?
Any advice is greatly appreciated!
-John
			Our group has been running the same method on two identical systems (Tekmar 3000 P&T, Agilent 6890 GC, Agilent 5973 MS) without issues for a few years now. The system I'm trying to get this method to work on is (Tekmar 3100 P&T), Agilent 7890 GC, Agilent 5975C MS).
All three systems have VOCARB 3000 traps and Agilent J&W DB624 columns (60m x 0.25mm ID X 1.4um film). The flow is split 50:1
The one systematic trend I find is that the reproducibility is worse for the light compounds, in particular the gases vinyl chloride, chlorethane and trichlorfluoromethane. I would expect a leak would cause gas problems but I am unable to find one. I also find it hard to believe it would cause an increase in recoveries.
Is there something different about the new instruments that might require a significant change in the method?
Any advice is greatly appreciated!
-John