Page 1 of 1
help me out about "Hyphenated Techniques" board in
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:17 pm
by netsking
Hi, there,
I am look for "Hyphenated Techniques", in GCMS LCMS board, the read this first mentioned to put question about LCMSMS in "Hyphenated Techniques" board. However, I can't find it here. Does anyone know where it is? Thanks in advance.
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:45 pm
by tom jupille
The "LC-MS, GC-MS, and other" board was originally called "hyphenated techniques", but some people felt that title was confusing. The name change happened a couple of years ago but some people (including me) still tend to use the old name.
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:48 am
by netsking
The "LC-MS, GC-MS, and other" board was originally called "hyphenated techniques", but some people felt that title was confusing. The name change happened a couple of years ago but some people (including me) still tend to use the old name.
Thanks a lot for your prompt response. In LCMS, GC-MS and others, there are a lot of information about GCMS rather than LCMSMS.
One suggestion: could you split LCMS and GCMS into two parts?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 12:55 am
by tom jupille
Sorry about the delay in replying; I lost track of this thread.
I *can* subdivide the board further, but I'd rather not. The issue is one of "critical mass" versus "unwieldy". I understand your point, but enough of the topics in the LC-MS, GC-MS, etc section deal with the "MS" part, that I think splitting it would be counterproductive.
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:02 pm
by Consumer Products Guy
I would recommend separating out GCMS and LCMS as separate headings. This is a separations board, isn't it !!!
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:12 pm
by tom jupille
Sometimes, separation can be *too* good!
Seriously, though, I just went back and looked at the threads on the current page. I did a "quick and dirty" subdivide into four categories based on whether the information was fairly specific to GC-MS or LC-MS or whether it was more MS-related (could apply to both GC or LC)
Here's my count:
- GC-MS specific: 13
- LC-MS specific: 11
- MS: 21
- general: 2
Final decision: it still makes more sense to me to leave it as one combined section, so I'm leaving it as-is.
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:08 am
by HW Mueller
To me the different categoies are mostly rather a nuisance, I usually have no problem picking out what I want to read from the title of a threat.