-
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:45 am
Advertisement
TEA for negative mode
Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
I would like to use an LC-method which contains TEA for an analysis in negative mode. I guess the TEA is not a problem for me, but will the other analysts kill me afterwards for contaminating the system? I have heard that it is almost impossible to get rid of.
-
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:45 am
Sorry, I should have searched the forum before posting. It seems rather nasty, but on the other hand this is a beautiful separation. Would you just let it go, or give it a try?
-
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:24 pm
We use ethanolamine for our negative ion work. It doesn't seem to interfere with our other analysis (mostly using formic or acetic acid additive). No guarantee it will work for you, though, since our experience is rather limited (MS/MS analysis only with a couple of different methods).
-
- Posts: 656
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 7:45 am
It should work, unless you get some kind of signal suppression (like with TFA in positive mode).
Do any have experience with signal suppression in negative mode?
Do any have experience with signal suppression in negative mode?
-
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:24 pm
After running samples in positive ion mode with formic acid in the mobile phase, the LC system must be purged very thoroughly or we see significant signal suppresion in negative mode. We don't have this problem going from negative to positive since the formic acid concentration (0.2%) is about 10x higher than ethanolamine.
I would imagine that as the concentration of ethanolamine is increased, you would eventually get suppression at some point. In our case, 2mM ethanolamine is enough to greatly increase response. Increasing this concentration up to 10mM does not seem to help much more. I haven't tried increasing beyond that because the pH begins to climb beyond what most columns can handle.
A whole book could be written on signal suppression caused by matrix components (and probably has), but usually this can be minimized by good chromatographic separation and careful choice of mobile phase additives.
I would imagine that as the concentration of ethanolamine is increased, you would eventually get suppression at some point. In our case, 2mM ethanolamine is enough to greatly increase response. Increasing this concentration up to 10mM does not seem to help much more. I haven't tried increasing beyond that because the pH begins to climb beyond what most columns can handle.
A whole book could be written on signal suppression caused by matrix components (and probably has), but usually this can be minimized by good chromatographic separation and careful choice of mobile phase additives.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:21 am
We had some very bad experience with TEA! I would strongly encourage you NOT to use it, unless the machine ist used only in negative ESI.
viewtopic.php?t=11799&highlight=tea
Matthias
viewtopic.php?t=11799&highlight=tea
Matthias
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science