Page 1 of 1
Stationary phase options for ion-pairing agents
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:59 pm
by KalB
My separation utilizes an ion-pairing agent to allow sufficient retention of my analyte and related species. I would like to redevelop the method and eliminate the ion-pairing agent. Would my best choice be a polar embedded stationary phase or a highly aqueous stationary phase (e.g. Atlantis dC18) to allow sufficient retention (k' > 2.5)? I am certain everyone can appreciate some of the challenges with using ion-pairing agents. Any recommendations for stationary phases (and rationale for choosing a given phase) would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:02 pm
by lmh
what's your analyte?
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:23 pm
by KalB
Thiol with an acidic group
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:31 pm
by praveenpaliwal
You can try Purosphere STAR also.
Waters Atlantis D-C18 is also a very good choice.
You can also try HILIC column of Merck
Best regards
Praveen
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:30 pm
by Vlad Orlovsky
Alternatively you can try anion-exchange reversed-phase columns (mixed-mode), where ion-pairing reagent is attached to the surface of silica gel.
Here are few applications for acidic compounds:
http://www.sielc.com/application_163.html
http://www.sielc.com/application_139.html
http://www.sielc.com/application_164.html
http://www.sielc.com/application_138.html
You can use almost any mobile phase which is compatible with your detection technique and with column pH ranges.
Contact me if you have specific questions about our approach.
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:23 pm
by Uwe Neue
You will get more retention for very polar compounds on the Atlantis dC18 or even better on the newer Atlantis T3 column.
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:25 pm
by KalB
Uwe,
Can you provide me with a comparison of the Atlantis dC18 and Atlantis T3 from a stationary phase perspective?
Thank you!
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm
by Uwe Neue
Both the Atlantis dC18 and the Atlantis T3 have about the same surface coverage, which maximizes retention in mobile phases with a purely aqueous composition (without the need for organic modifiers). The Atlantis T3 is the newer version. It uses a much improved endcapping process which provides additional stability under acidic mobile phase conditions. Otherwise, the properties of both packings are very similar. For a new application, I would recommend to use the Atlantis T3.
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:47 pm
by Vlad Orlovsky
here is comparison of Obelisc R, Zorbax SB-AQ, Synergy C18 and Atlantis T3 for retention of various polar analytes. As you can see mixed-mode can provide much higher retention for polar
ionizable analyte due to the presence of two mechanisms - reversed-phase and ion exchange:
http://www.sielc.com/pdf/SIELC_August_2008.pdf
if you compounds are not ionizable, Atlantis T3 in RP (very low organic) or HILIC (with high organic) should work for you.
Contact me if you have questions.
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:03 pm
by Bryan Evans
Is there any more information about the solute?
Seems like Normal Phase would be a good option
Below are organic acids on Unison UK-Amino:
http://www.imtaktusa.com/site_media/fil ... TI542E.pdf