-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:46 am
Advertisement
Cleaning HIC Column
Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
Im working with a column that has 'in house' synthesized packing, the base material is porasil silica from waters and these particles were functionalized with mixture of short oligo ethylene glycol silane and octyltrichlorosilane. I ran the column with 50 mM phosphate buffer and various concentration of Na2SO4 or (NH4)2SO4. The test sample is lysozyme, dissolve in pure water. The first set of run is fine, i get good tR and peak shape. I noticed a decrease in recovery especially at high salt concentration (max 1 M). After several hr of runs, I left it alone, the next day I failed to run the column. The recovery was extremely low, peak was very flat, tR shifted a lot. I think I have some protein left over in the column. I tried to clean the column using various solutions such as 6 M guanidine HCl, 0.1% TFA/isopropanol, 30-70% ethanol, 0.1% TFA/acetonitrile. All failed, can anyone suggest me a cleaning method? Thanks.
-
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:54 am
http://www.lcgceurope.com/lcgceurope/da ... rticle.pdf - Table 3, page 4
1. Acetic acid 1% in water
2. Trifluoroacetic acid 1% in water
3. 0.1% Trifluoroacetic acid–propanol 40:60 (v/v) (viscous; use reduced flow-rate)
4. TEA–propanol 40:60 (v/v) (adjust 0.25 N phosphoric acid to
pH 2.5 with triethylamine before mixing)
5. Aqueous urea or guanidine 5–8 M (adjusted to pH 6–8)
6. Aqueous sodium chloride, sodium 0.5–1.0 M (sodium phosphate pH 7.0) phosphate or sodium sulphate
7. DMSO–water or dimethylformamide–water 50:50 (v/v)
Adapted from R.L. Cunico, K.M. Gooding and T. Wehr, “Basic HPLC and CE of Biomolecules,â€
1. Acetic acid 1% in water
2. Trifluoroacetic acid 1% in water
3. 0.1% Trifluoroacetic acid–propanol 40:60 (v/v) (viscous; use reduced flow-rate)
4. TEA–propanol 40:60 (v/v) (adjust 0.25 N phosphoric acid to
pH 2.5 with triethylamine before mixing)
5. Aqueous urea or guanidine 5–8 M (adjusted to pH 6–8)
6. Aqueous sodium chloride, sodium 0.5–1.0 M (sodium phosphate pH 7.0) phosphate or sodium sulphate
7. DMSO–water or dimethylformamide–water 50:50 (v/v)
Adapted from R.L. Cunico, K.M. Gooding and T. Wehr, “Basic HPLC and CE of Biomolecules,â€
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:46 am
Yep, that's the reference that I have, that apparently doesnt really help my case. Thanks anyway

-
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:55 pm
Have you considered that your stationary phase may be damaged? Do you have a separate, small molecule organic (e.g., toluene) that you can inject to check for peak shape?
Merlin K. L. Bicking, Ph.D.
ACCTA, Inc.
ACCTA, Inc.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:46 am
Yes, I thought of that, right now Im in the process of verifying whether the coating on the particles is damaged, thank you.
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 327 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 326 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 326 guests
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 326 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science