Agilent Poroshell 300SB C3 or C8 for protein MW's <= 40 k
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:38 am
I am currently using Vydac 5 µm C4 columns for protein analytics, i.e. separation of folded and misfolded(disulfide isomers)/modified species. I would like to increase throughput by using porous/porous shell columns. I tested so far a ProSwift monolithic column and Poros R1. Both show a much worse separation power compared to the Vydac column even if I don't make use of the higher flow rates possible with the porous materials. And both seem to be less hydrophobic than the Vydac C4: Vydac>~PorosR1>>ProSwift. Higher temperatures don't change the situation.
Now I would like to test an Agilent Poroshell column. My first thought was to test the C8. But maybe C3 would be the better choice. Proteins of interest elute usually between 25 and 35 % ACN from the Vydac C4 at 40 °C (H2O/ACN 0.05/0.043 % TFA). Thanks for you advice. (Note: I won't get columns for testing from Agilent. I have to buy them. But I cannot buy both, the C3 and the C8.)
Now I would like to test an Agilent Poroshell column. My first thought was to test the C8. But maybe C3 would be the better choice. Proteins of interest elute usually between 25 and 35 % ACN from the Vydac C4 at 40 °C (H2O/ACN 0.05/0.043 % TFA). Thanks for you advice. (Note: I won't get columns for testing from Agilent. I have to buy them. But I cannot buy both, the C3 and the C8.)