Sulfonamides by LCMSMS
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:49 pm
We are currently running standards of sulfonamides on LCMSMS and have the following queries. Any help on these would be much appreciated
1. Two sulfonamides Sulfadoxine and Sulfadimethoxine that have to be analysed are positional isomers. They have the same precurson ion (311) and the same product ions (156, 108, etc.). We are even getting the same retention time for both. It would not be possible to distinguish between the compounds under these conditions. Can someone suggest any alternative to this or would it be sufficient to study the transition once at the same retention time.
2. There are also some doubts regarding another sulfonamide Sulfanilamide. We have purchased the standard from Sigma Aldrich. The product ion for quantification should be (156) for the precursor ion (173) according to the literature but we are not getting this ion in abundance by all possible changes in the collsion energy and the fragmentor. Would anyone have you any idea about such behaviour of the fragmenation pattern of the compound or is there some problem with the standard we have purchased.
Thanks
1. Two sulfonamides Sulfadoxine and Sulfadimethoxine that have to be analysed are positional isomers. They have the same precurson ion (311) and the same product ions (156, 108, etc.). We are even getting the same retention time for both. It would not be possible to distinguish between the compounds under these conditions. Can someone suggest any alternative to this or would it be sufficient to study the transition once at the same retention time.
2. There are also some doubts regarding another sulfonamide Sulfanilamide. We have purchased the standard from Sigma Aldrich. The product ion for quantification should be (156) for the precursor ion (173) according to the literature but we are not getting this ion in abundance by all possible changes in the collsion energy and the fragmentor. Would anyone have you any idea about such behaviour of the fragmenation pattern of the compound or is there some problem with the standard we have purchased.
Thanks