Advertisement

Mass 219 is low in tune for 5973N

Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.

3 posts Page 1 of 1
Hello everyone,

I changed the filament of my 5973N, since it was broken, and also cleaned the source. After that, the tune has changed compared to my older tunes. Normally, 219/69 is around 90-120% with an intensity of ~400000. The last EM volts were 1247 together with the following values:

69.00: 311232 100.00% Ratio: 1.18
219.00: 377600 121.32% Ratio: 4.38
502.00: 42128 13.54% Ratio: 9.62


Now the parameters are:

EM Volt: 1529

69.00: 466176 100.00% Ratio: 1.09
219.00: 159488 34.21% Ratio: 3.77
502.00: 17496 3.75% Ratio: 10.59

Air/Water and vacuum are okay, I also checked the cables for the right connection. The middle mass is the most important for my analytes, so it would be really nice if somebody has an idea for this problem.
First of all, you need to specify which tune you are using, and make sure you used the same one both before and after changing the source (otherwise you're not comparing apples to apples).

Secondly, does the 219 peak look okay in the tune report? If they are fine and there are no other problems indicated on the tune report, the instrument should be fine. If you need a higher response from 219 relative to 69 in order to do your analysis... well, that's what target tunes are for! You can use the software to adjust the mass filter settings to get you the ratios you need.

Read the help files on the Tune Wizard and/or Manual Tuning. If you are running a particular method like 8260, Agilent has documents explaining how it all works. For example: https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/supp ... f05011.pdf
First of all, you need to specify which tune you are using, and make sure you used the same one both before and after changing the source (otherwise you're not comparing apples to apples).

Secondly, does the 219 peak look okay in the tune report? If they are fine and there are no other problems indicated on the tune report, the instrument should be fine. If you need a higher response from 219 relative to 69 in order to do your analysis... well, that's what target tunes are for! You can use the software to adjust the mass filter settings to get you the ratios you need.

Read the help files on the Tune Wizard and/or Manual Tuning. If you are running a particular method like 8260, Agilent has documents explaining how it all works. For example: https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/supp ... f05011.pdf
Thank you for your fast help! Normally, I tune with atune and it worked for me for the last years. But I tried the target tune as you said, and it helped increase the 219. I hope that the new tune will work well for my analytes. Thank you!
3 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 12 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 12 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry