by
lmh » Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:09 pm
There are tools out there, such as Mass Frontier. I heard a rumour that the developers of Chemdraw were thinking about adding such a feature, but it was only a rumour.
Frankly, from an LC-MS perspective, I am unimpressed by tools so far, and also by what little I've seen of textbooks. For GC-MS, the textbooks are better.
There are instrument-related reasons why LC-MS fragmentation differs between instruments, which doesn't help, but the main difficulty is chemistry. GC-MS fragmentation, by EI, is highish-energy. Generally the mechanism is that a load of energy is put into a molecule, and shuffles itself about amongst the available bonds. If one happens to get more energy than its bond energy, it breaks. This is called Quasi Equilibrium Theory (QET). The transition states are simple, and there are many of them, so once there is enough energy to make it possible, it happens rapidly. But it doesn't happen at low energy.
CID in LC-MS systems is low-energy. Here, only reaction mechanisms with low-energy transition states can apply. These are usually intra-molecular reactions where parts of the molecule have to interact, so the molecule needs to be in a particular conformation. This is statistically unlikely, so it's slow, and dominates only at low energy.
But the important bit is that these low-energy intramolecular reaction fragmentations are very dependent on the exact geometry of the molecule, and which groups can interact with which others. They are therefore much harder to predict than EI fragmentations.
(footnote: there are, of course, some EI mechanisms that depend on specific conformations, e.g. the famous McLafferty rearrangement, but they seem few enough to be documented! Correct me if wrong...)