by
JMB » Thu Feb 06, 2025 4:16 pm
Part of the difference between the data can be explained by the instrumental difference between the two methods.
With an HPLC-UV method, the analyte passes through the flow-cell and leaves it clean as a whistle; you could run 50 or 100 replicates of the same sample and get only VERY minor differences in area counts. Over a longish period of time (some years) the deuterium lamp will age and area counts will decline. UV ( like NMR) is a non-destructive detection method.
Any method based on Mass Spec is destructive of the analyte, and every single analysis degrades the performance of the instrument. You COULD prove this to yourself by starting with a newly-cleaned source and rods and making replicate injections of a single analyte; you will see the area counts fall quite obviously.
50 ppm and 15 ppm are more different than you would expect to see if that was a single-analyte sample, run by MS back-to-back on the same day; I would expect only about 5% difference.
However, 50 and 15 ppm on DIFFERENT days—-how many other samples (each of which degraded the MS performance somewhat) went through in the interim?
If you set up to run say more than 5-10 samples at a time, you should think about including a check standard or calibration standard every so often; others can advise on the details.
Good Luck!