Advertisement

what is major drawback of spme

Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.

4 posts Page 1 of 1
why it is not good for quantification?

SPME is often used for quantitative work.

its limit solid phase verus large number of volitile compounds will be its problem?
SPME is often used for quantitative work.
why it is not good for quantification?
SPME doesn't represent the "real fingerprint" of analytes external to the fiber. In other words the adsorption from liquid (or gas) to the fiber is regulated by the relative partition equilibrium. This means that if you need quantitation, multiple calibration level are needs and also different internal standard must be introduced according to the classes of compound present into the sample.

Another drawback is the need of cryofocusing for early eluted compounds if you need to avoid the use of split injection (loss of sensitivity). The latest point was recently solved by me by real on column injection of fiber into the analytical column.

By this means I am now able to measure on the same run gases as nitrogen or argon and heavy molecules without any focusing device.

Ciao.

Roby
4 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 60 users online :: 3 registered, 0 hidden and 57 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 57 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry