-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 7:25 am
Advertisement
Nicotine analysis
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
I am trying to use GC/FID to analyze Nicotine, LOD=0,04ppm. I know that NPD is more sensivity but I don't have. At present, I have GC/FID, GC/ECD, GC/FPD and a HPLC with DAD and FLD. Which instrument can use to get more sensivity than GC/FID? If anyone has any suggestions it would be very helpful.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 2:21 pm
Thachtruc
Either the electron capture or the FPD (in the N mode) will be very much more sensitive than the FID for nicotine. Just watch that you don't inject a chlorinated solvent into the ECD. LC with UV detection might get you down to the levels you want also, but I am not as certain of that. Also just out of curiosity, what is the FLD you listed?
Regards,
Mark
Either the electron capture or the FPD (in the N mode) will be very much more sensitive than the FID for nicotine. Just watch that you don't inject a chlorinated solvent into the ECD. LC with UV detection might get you down to the levels you want also, but I am not as certain of that. Also just out of curiosity, what is the FLD you listed?
Regards,
Mark
Mark
-
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 3:00 am
You probably will not do much better in terms of detection limit with the ECD if the sample matrix is as complex as I suspect. If you are analyzing nicotine in smoke the matrix will probably make the baseline noisy. I am not aware of any FPD that has a nitrogen mode that is really usable. I know that companies selling PFPDs claim to be able to do nitrogen, but the detection limit for a PFPD would be orders of magnitude higher than the FID. A standard FPD will not detect nitrogenous compounds at all.
Almost all nicotine analysis I have been involved in is performed using GCMS.
Almost all nicotine analysis I have been involved in is performed using GCMS.
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 2:21 pm
thachtruc and Ron,
Sorry, I was thinking about the NP detector (thermionic bead detector), not the FPD. Ron is right, the FPD is basically useless on nitrogen. The NPD does work nicely though. I am surprised that you are having reproducibility problems with the ECD for nicotine, I used on for years in an environmental lab have to meet EPA calibrations and as long as the detector was clean we had no serious problems meeting the EPA reproducibility and linearity requirements.
Anyway, sorry about the detector meix-up, really intended to mention the NPD, not the FPD.
Hanging my head in shame,
Mark
Sorry, I was thinking about the NP detector (thermionic bead detector), not the FPD. Ron is right, the FPD is basically useless on nitrogen. The NPD does work nicely though. I am surprised that you are having reproducibility problems with the ECD for nicotine, I used on for years in an environmental lab have to meet EPA calibrations and as long as the detector was clean we had no serious problems meeting the EPA reproducibility and linearity requirements.
Anyway, sorry about the detector meix-up, really intended to mention the NPD, not the FPD.
Hanging my head in shame,
Mark
Mark
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 14 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 13 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 13 guests
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 13 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
