Page 1 of 1

why Dextran is chosen to be material for GPC

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:29 am
by jiang295
because it is very hydrophilic?

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:15 pm
by Uwe Neue
It is good for the SEC of proteins and peptides, which contain multiple charges. It also binds water rather well, and has close to no hydrophobicity. With silica-based packings, these properties have been emulated with well-designed diol packings.

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:10 am
by jiang295
can you make sure that there is almost no hydrophobic interaction between it and rather hydrophobic organic compounds?
It is good for the SEC of proteins and peptides, which contain multiple charges. It also binds water rather well, and has close to no hydrophobicity. With silica-based packings, these properties have been emulated with well-designed diol packings.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:29 pm
by Csaba
Dextran was first used (and still is) as plasma substitute. Hence, it was known that Dextran has low irreversible interaction with proteins. When locking for a material suitable as stationary phase for GPC of proteins and pepetides, Dextran was the first (and lucky) choice.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:01 pm
by jiang295
how about small molecules rather than protein?
Dextran was first used (and still is) as plasma substitute. Hence, it was known that Dextran has low irreversible interaction with proteins. When locking for a material suitable as stationary phase for GPC of proteins and pepetides, Dextran was the first (and lucky) choice.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 4:33 pm
by HW Mueller
At 1:11 am in the other chain, I already tried to do something to get on with this question. If you don´t reply to that I can´t help you further.