by
lmh » Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:06 am
(1) the temperature is there to ensure all solvent is dried away. If you still have solvent present, it will reduce signal, but in extreme cases can also (in some instruments, e.g. single quads) create noise, because tiny droplets getting through the analyzer will be measured as a signal, but arrive at random times, and therefore be assigned random masses.
(2) once the solvent is gone, there is no benefit in further heating.
(3) in some cases, some compounds can be heat-sensitive, and will be lost if you use excessive spray-chamber temperatures. However, heat sensitivity in the lab isn't the same as heat sensitivity in a spray chamber; compounds survive temperatures in a spray chamber that would fry them in seconds in the lab (obvious example is proteins)
(4) ESI gives a signal proportional to concentration, not amount, so reducing flow (for the same amount of sample injected) will increase signal.
(5) ESI creates a plume of ions that is sampled by the capillary that acts as interface between spray chamber and high-vacuum. If your instrument allows it, you can experiment with gas flows and needle positioning in order to get the best bit of the plume of ions close to the end of the capillary.
(6) In critical cases, you should also optimise ion transfer. Make sure lens voltages are appropriate to draw ions of the mass that interests you into the instrument. Your manufacturer should be able to help with procedures for this.
(7) I personally wouldn't fiddle with the EM voltage. Manufacturers tend to optimise this pretty well as part of their calibration routine. Increasing it is unlikely to improve things vastly (if it did, the manufacturer would already have done it!), but it will decrease the lifespan of your EM horn, which is expensive.