-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 7:25 pm
0.6g sucrose, 0.1g maltose, 0.3g lactose, 0.1g fructose, 0.1g glucose, 0.05g galactose and diluting it to 50mL to produce a 2.5% stock solution. I then diluted this stock solution and made 5 dilutions: 1 parts stock:5 parts water, 2:5, 3:5, 4:5, and the full strength solution. I did three injections of each point, 1:5x3, 2:5x3, 3:5x3, 4:5x3, 5:5x3. I created my curve by using % amount and assigned the values as follows...
full strength stock
60% sucrose, 30% lactose, 10% maltose, 10% fructose, 10% glucose and 5% galactose
4:5 solution
48% sucrose, 24% lactose, 8% maltose, 8% fructose, 8% glucose and 4% galactose
3:5 solution
36% sucrose, 18% lactose, 6% maltose, 6% fructose, 6% glucose and 3% galactose
2:5 solution
24% sucrose, 12% lactose, 4% maltose, 4% fructose, 4% glucose and 2% galactose
1:5 solution
12% sucrose, 6% lactose, 2% maltose, 2% fructose, 2% glucose and 1% galactose
Doing this I had great correlations of 0.99 or better on every sugar curve.
I am here to ask... does this all make sense/seem logical/how you would do it? I am here because after analyzing our sugar QA sample (prepped 1.25g->50mL) that we test weekly on our current sugar method of spectrophotometry/enzyme kits, I am getting pretty significantly different results than we expected. They are all elevated... results are
3% glucose/36% sucrose/2% maltose/21% lactose 64% total sugar on the HPLC
vs
1% glucose/28% sucrose/1% maltose/15% lactose 45% total sugar with the kit
I am certain it has to have something to do with my diluting/telling the system what the sugar %amounts are but I don't see where I might be wrong. "you don't know what you don't know" sort of situation.
I really appreciate any help I can get!
