Poor repeatability of GC quantification analysis
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:48 am
Hi all:
I'm using GC-FID (model number: HP 5890 series II) for quantification analysis of chloroform vapor in a gas sample. The molar fraction of chloroform is about 20%. Due to limitation of apparatus I have, I use a syringe to manually transfer gas sample from a gas sampling bulb to GC. The repeatability is very low. Run-to-run variation can be above 20%. From textbooks and experienced people, manual injection may introduce some uncertainty, but I doubt it causes that hight RSD. What is RSD you would expect with manual injection? Where could be the error source accounting for this large uncertainty other than injection variables?
I try split and splitless modes, but there seems no difference in terms of repeatability. Which one would be suggested for my case?
Thanks for your time.
Best Regards,
Simon
I'm using GC-FID (model number: HP 5890 series II) for quantification analysis of chloroform vapor in a gas sample. The molar fraction of chloroform is about 20%. Due to limitation of apparatus I have, I use a syringe to manually transfer gas sample from a gas sampling bulb to GC. The repeatability is very low. Run-to-run variation can be above 20%. From textbooks and experienced people, manual injection may introduce some uncertainty, but I doubt it causes that hight RSD. What is RSD you would expect with manual injection? Where could be the error source accounting for this large uncertainty other than injection variables?
I try split and splitless modes, but there seems no difference in terms of repeatability. Which one would be suggested for my case?
Thanks for your time.
Best Regards,
Simon