by
ece » Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:35 am
Yeah we're getting some purolite, we're tired of spending days and days washing and settling, not to mention tons of soapy waste water generated in the process. Now that it is economical, and that it can be recharged with methanol rinses, we're looking forward to seeing what kind of results we can get from it. Bubble washing does work, but it's labor intensive.
Have you been happy overall with purolite? I'd like to know from an actual user.
Does purolite sell small samples of these? That would make my bench work miles easier right now. I'm so bottlenecked with samples I made earlier in the week that are still washing. But the rep hasn't told us he can give us small samples sizes that I can use in the lab.
Good to see your samples are looking ok, but you do need the calibration curves generated so you know exactly what your glyceride numbers are (cause you have to put those in to calc the amounts), as well as to have the assurance that your column is responding repeatably and for the appropriate concentrations, even if you can still get a good feel for it by looking at the peaks themselves. Having used 3 columns already, the calibration slopes and y-intercepts for me have not changed that much for every time I've installed a new one, but I always calibrate it anyway to make sure it is performing up to standard.