Page 1 of 2
inconsistancy in both,peak area and peak height in HPLC
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:50 am
by pdyogita
Hi all ,
I am using XDB 50 mm column with a mobile phase (30:70 )ACN:H2O.
I am injecting 3 Nitrotoluene 10 ul.But the problem is when I do replicates of my standards I am not getting similar or somewhat similar peak areas.The same with peak heights.
They differ significantly and cannot be considered as data for quntification!
Can anybody suggest me what can I try?.The peak has also started tailing a bit.
please help me.I am using perkin elmer's HPLC.
thank you
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:52 am
by aceto_81
You should try to find the source of the variation.
Do you have some in house procedure for testing an HPLC?
Or you can try to add an internal standard and see if this solves your problem (in case of an autosampler with a variation that is too high)
Ace
repeatable injections
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:35 am
by Jeffrey Bodycomb
I suggest you start by checking your injection repeatability.
I bet you have already done the paragraph below and that is why you wrote.
I want to ensure your problem is not in sample preparation. First, ensure that you have a large (5 mL) quantity of fully dissolved, well mixed sample solution. Inject the same sample 2 or 3 times to check repeatability.
It is probably helpful to check with your injector/autosampler supplier for advice. Here are some problems I have had or seen in the past.
1. Injecting too little material into a manual injector. Inject 3-5 loop volumes (Rheodyne discusses this quite nicely in their manuals).
2. Autosampler needle is hitting the bottom of the vial. Change the autosampler settings to that the needle does not go down too far.
3. Autosampler is drawing less material because no air is replacing the liquid drawn up by the needle. Removing the septum from the autosampler vial fixes this, but I agree it is unsatisfactory.
Once you have repeatable injections, you can try making the same sample multiple times to see if there is an issue with solution concentration repeatability.
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:47 am
by grzesiek
post results please
RESULTS post
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 5:38 pm
by pdyogita
First of all thank you all for replies!
I am using inhouse method.I am shooting replicates of stanard(15ppm).
Here posting results,
peak area height
7416530.37 1.04E+06
7786459.2 1.11E+06
8439518.21 1.18E+06
So,this is what happening!..getting indifferent results for three consecutive injections, of a single std.vial.
I have made sure that the needle is not touching the bottom if vial.
thank you
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:11 pm
by grzesiek
"1.04E+06" - does it mean absorbance is about 1.04?
peak area nad height is rising, do you purge(wash?) injector between injections?
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:35 pm
by pdyogita
Thanks.
No, I don't wash injector before every injection.When I make my system ready I do wash it,flush autosampler,and then start a whole sequence when I am injecting a single sample or series of stds.of same conc.
So,do you think I need to flush it everytime I make a single injection?
really appreciate your responce!
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:40 pm
by grzesiek
well I use HPLC with autosampler, I can specify how long injector is washed between injections, I can change wash solvent if I get carryover which helps, newer systems can have more than one solvent to wash injector
This is washing between injections not purging of course

If you do not wash than you should
Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:14 pm
by Uwe Neue
Could it be that your solvent is evaporating?
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:57 am
by tedinelkgrove
I agree with grzesiek regarding the wash between injections. That feature was added to autosamplers to eliminate injection port/needle carry-over.
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 5:20 am
by pdyogita
Thank you all for your kind replies!
I will make sure injector wash before every injection!!
will let you guys know when I fix this problem.
Thanks!!
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:09 pm
by tom jupille
We might be jumping to conclusions based on a small data set (there is, after all, a 50% chance that a third measurement will trend in the same direction as the second). The key would be to run a larger number of replicates (maybe six?) to confirm that the trend *is* in fact that your peak size increases continuously.
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:56 am
by pdyogita
Hi all,
Actually ,I am using MeOH as a diluent (for standard dilution here).
I am not sure if MeOH evaporates so fast within a five minute run time.
so,I don't know but there might be a chance of increase in peak area?..do you think it is possible..or else I have to blame the machine..!
So, I also have tried this dilution with N-hexane..but results are still the same!
STILL THINKING OVER THIS PROBLEM!
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 6:17 am
by aceto_81
Could you post results of 6 injections in a row?
And if possible 6 injections with an injection of pure methanol inbetween.
Ace
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:17 am
by HW Mueller
Well, if it is carryover then a blank injection should show it.