pulsed amperometric detectors
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:15 am
With regards to pulsed electrochemical detection waveform optimization....
These waveforms obviously vary depending on the type of analytes in question but typically waveforms contain 5-8 parameters (time and potential parameters). Does anyone believe it is absolutely necessary when creating hydrodynamic voltammograms or optimizing pulsed waveforms for multiple analytes (1-5 analytes) after they've been resolved by HPLC to remove the working electrode and polish it after each time or potential parameter change? To me, this sounds rather cumbersome but is there really any advantage to doing this?
For hydrodynamic voltammetry, one can used DC amperometry and just change the potential for a series of separations to observe peak height/area versus applied potential response. I wonder if it is necessary to remove and polish the working electrode for each potential change.
Any thoughts?
These waveforms obviously vary depending on the type of analytes in question but typically waveforms contain 5-8 parameters (time and potential parameters). Does anyone believe it is absolutely necessary when creating hydrodynamic voltammograms or optimizing pulsed waveforms for multiple analytes (1-5 analytes) after they've been resolved by HPLC to remove the working electrode and polish it after each time or potential parameter change? To me, this sounds rather cumbersome but is there really any advantage to doing this?
For hydrodynamic voltammetry, one can used DC amperometry and just change the potential for a series of separations to observe peak height/area versus applied potential response. I wonder if it is necessary to remove and polish the working electrode for each potential change.
Any thoughts?