retention change
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:31 am
Dear All,
Recently I performed a routine analysis of chiral separation,which comprises of a chiral column and a mixture of isopropanol and hexane(40:60) for mobile phase. The results from differnent istrumentations and lots of solvent have no impact on quantitative analysis,however,the retention changes made me confused. The chromatograms as follows:
[/url]
First I think the changes may be resulted in dwell volume of instruments,but some literatures indicate this factor have no interferance on isocractic separation,then an idea came into my brain:whether mobile phase components interfere with the retention or not. OK, I tried this solution. In the latest analysis(3rd time, 20 Jul.), I used a new batch of IPA into the original pure IPA(not fresh IPA absolutely) and the retention close to the result from method validation,a slighly difference exist however. I sure that the mobile phase from different lots made the retention variability,because the IPA used in 2nd analysis(25 Jun.) are same as in method validation(02 Feb.),but the resevior isn't sealed and the solvent is exposure to air,so IPA absorbed the moisture in air and the composition changed, therefore the retention varied accordingly.I've little experience on chiral separation in NPLC, so I hope you give me some practical advices. Thanks
By the way, I read the FDA's reviewer guidance(1994)"validation of chromatograhpy method" and the sentence puzzled me:
" when used as an impurity test method, the sensitivity is enhanced if the enantiomer impurity elute before the enantiomeric drug."(Chiral chromatography)
So is it important that the impurity must be eluted before the main component for monitoring the impurity method?
Recently I performed a routine analysis of chiral separation,which comprises of a chiral column and a mixture of isopropanol and hexane(40:60) for mobile phase. The results from differnent istrumentations and lots of solvent have no impact on quantitative analysis,however,the retention changes made me confused. The chromatograms as follows:
[/url]First I think the changes may be resulted in dwell volume of instruments,but some literatures indicate this factor have no interferance on isocractic separation,then an idea came into my brain:whether mobile phase components interfere with the retention or not. OK, I tried this solution. In the latest analysis(3rd time, 20 Jul.), I used a new batch of IPA into the original pure IPA(not fresh IPA absolutely) and the retention close to the result from method validation,a slighly difference exist however. I sure that the mobile phase from different lots made the retention variability,because the IPA used in 2nd analysis(25 Jun.) are same as in method validation(02 Feb.),but the resevior isn't sealed and the solvent is exposure to air,so IPA absorbed the moisture in air and the composition changed, therefore the retention varied accordingly.I've little experience on chiral separation in NPLC, so I hope you give me some practical advices. Thanks
By the way, I read the FDA's reviewer guidance(1994)"validation of chromatograhpy method" and the sentence puzzled me:
" when used as an impurity test method, the sensitivity is enhanced if the enantiomer impurity elute before the enantiomeric drug."(Chiral chromatography)
So is it important that the impurity must be eluted before the main component for monitoring the impurity method?