-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:25 pm
Advertisement
Is my pressure too high?
Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.
8 posts
Page 1 of 1
Hey guys I am new to setting up GC's so I have a question. I am using an HP5890 with on column injection and FID, no EPC only manual control. I have a 0.53 mm guard column attached to 0.32 analytical column. The method requires 3ml/min flow thru the column. Checking with the bubble meter attached to the FID i am only getting 1.2 ml/min of carrier gas @ 70psi at the gc regulator. The regulator itself only goes up to 100psi. First of all does this sound like too high psi for the flow rate on that column? It is such a small bore so I don't know. Also could this hint to a leak somewhere in the system? I am too broke to buy a leak detector and I have heard to not use leak checking solutions? Any help would be appreciated thanks!
-
- Posts: 3594
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:43 pm
I used a 5890 with manual pressure controls today, great GC. You need to download Agilent's Flow Calculator utility, several versions are available such as at http://www.chem.agilent.com/en-US/Support/Downloads/Utilities/Pages/GcPressureFlow.aspxHey guys I am new to setting up GC's so I have a question. I am using an HP5890 with on column injection and FID, no EPC only manual control. I have a 0.53 mm guard column attached to 0.32 analytical column. The method requires 3ml/min flow thru the column. Checking with the bubble meter attached to the FID i am only getting 1.2 ml/min of carrier gas @ 70psi at the gc regulator. The regulator itself only goes up to 100psi. First of all does this sound like too high psi for the flow rate on that column? It is such a small bore so I don't know. Also could this hint to a leak somewhere in the system? I am too broke to buy a leak detector and I have heard to not use leak checking solutions? Any help would be appreciated thanks!
70 psi at the regulator is plenty. We use helium as carrier, and you didn't state column length, but with a 30 m 0.32mm i.d. column that utility tells me that 15.8 psi helium head pressure will deiver 3.00 ml carrier flow at 100C oven temperature. 0.32mm i.d. column is not that small, we've used smaller, but I used 0.32 today, and used about 14 psi head pressure myself. How exactly are you hooking up (connecting) the bubble meter to measure the capillary flow?
-
- Posts: 5433
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:29 pm
70 psi (nearly 5 bar) is way too high for the flow you measure unless the column is exceptionally long.
Either the measurement of the flow is wrong, or you have a plumbing problem. Are you sure that you have the units of pressure correct ?, 70 KPa (0.7 bar) is not so far off. As a double check inject some methane or other unretained gas (e.g. lighter gas) and measure how long it takes for the peak to appear at the FID. This gives the average linear velocity of the gas through the column, multiply that by the cross sectional area and you have the volume flow. It will not be exactly the volume flow measured at the exit because the gas decompresses as it flows down the column but it is close enough for first pass trouble shooting.
A leak is possible. How are you connecting the column to the guard column ? If you have no leak detector you can use isopropanol/ water 1:1 as a bubble solution (do not use anything with soap or detergents in it). You will have to cool the inlet and detector so that it does not boil.
What carrier gas are you using ?, and how long is the column ?
Peter
Either the measurement of the flow is wrong, or you have a plumbing problem. Are you sure that you have the units of pressure correct ?, 70 KPa (0.7 bar) is not so far off. As a double check inject some methane or other unretained gas (e.g. lighter gas) and measure how long it takes for the peak to appear at the FID. This gives the average linear velocity of the gas through the column, multiply that by the cross sectional area and you have the volume flow. It will not be exactly the volume flow measured at the exit because the gas decompresses as it flows down the column but it is close enough for first pass trouble shooting.
A leak is possible. How are you connecting the column to the guard column ? If you have no leak detector you can use isopropanol/ water 1:1 as a bubble solution (do not use anything with soap or detergents in it). You will have to cool the inlet and detector so that it does not boil.
What carrier gas are you using ?, and how long is the column ?
Peter
Peter Apps
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:25 pm
Hi, carrier gas is helium, guard column is 5m, analytical is 15m, so 20m overall. Im using an agilent ultimate union to join the two. So I will go check right now because it seems like that a leak in the union might be the cause. I have the bubble meter hooked up via the adapter piece that sticks in the FID. I am using the calculations given in the hp 6890 operations manual to find mL/min 1/t if measuring the meniscus from 0 to the first mark, 10/t from 0 to second mark etc.
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:41 am
Hi
Make up of the FID is closed? maybe you aren't measuring only carrier gas
Make up of the FID is closed? maybe you aren't measuring only carrier gas
Francesc
Sorry for my english
Sorry for my english
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:41 am
Sorry
I'm said a stupid thing. I'm thinking in hollidays...
I'm said a stupid thing. I'm thinking in hollidays...
Francesc
Sorry for my english
Sorry for my english
-
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:04 am
Excessive pressure to drive a column may mean an obstruction in the column. How have you joined the guard column to the analytical column? (I have had a column which required excessive pressure to drive it - and the problem went from one instrument to another with the column. There were no leaks and I confirmed column flow rates with an unretained analyte.)
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:25 pm
Hello to all thanks for your input, i was calculating the flow wrong. I wanted mL/min, what i was calculating was mL/s. (1/t)60 is what i should have been doing. OOPS.
Also i was using the stopwatch on my phone not the stopwatch on the gc which calculates it for you! do what the manual says lol
Also i was using the stopwatch on my phone not the stopwatch on the gc which calculates it for you! do what the manual says lol
8 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 70 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 68 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 68 guests
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 68 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
