silica gel and 8270 compounds
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2021 5:28 pm
Hi all, hoping someone can help me out with this.
I'm working on a way to lower the amount of separate sample extractions we do in our organic prep department to increase throughput and turn around time.
Currently we do 1 extraction that produces an extract that is split between 8270 and TPH, which works fine after picking common surrogate compounds. The limiting factor has been ETPH samples that require a silica gel cleanup prior to concentrating. We've just done a test by treating LCS's with silica gel to see if the 8270 compound list was affected, and most notably a few of the phenols (2,4-dinitrophenol, pentachlorophenol, 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol) and hexachlorocyclopentadiene are showing very low recovery when compared to a normal LCS without silica gel.
I'm not sure where to start to troubleshoot this one, maybe try a different pore/mesh size of silica gel? We are currently using 60-200 mesh grade 62
Any help is appreciated!
I'm working on a way to lower the amount of separate sample extractions we do in our organic prep department to increase throughput and turn around time.
Currently we do 1 extraction that produces an extract that is split between 8270 and TPH, which works fine after picking common surrogate compounds. The limiting factor has been ETPH samples that require a silica gel cleanup prior to concentrating. We've just done a test by treating LCS's with silica gel to see if the 8270 compound list was affected, and most notably a few of the phenols (2,4-dinitrophenol, pentachlorophenol, 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol) and hexachlorocyclopentadiene are showing very low recovery when compared to a normal LCS without silica gel.
I'm not sure where to start to troubleshoot this one, maybe try a different pore/mesh size of silica gel? We are currently using 60-200 mesh grade 62
Any help is appreciated!