Advertisement

Help - Protein not binding to C4, C18

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

11 posts Page 1 of 1
"am experiencing lack of protein binding to C4 and C18 trap columns. I am optimizing the method using BSA at 2pmol/ul in 0.5% ACN/0.1% FA. 10ul (= 20pmol = 1.34ug on trap) are loaded on either C4 or C18 at 80ul/min connected to a ESI-QTOF. The protein elutes after 0.45 min (= dead volume of the LC system). The loading solvent is 10% ACN/0.1% FA."


"The method for binding proteins to RP material is well established, however I am not sure what is leading to the lack of binding? The percentage of organic solvent in the sample is low (+/- 1-5%) and the pH should be acidic due to the presence of 0.1% FA. Under these conditions proteins should bind to C4 and C18 material. Perhaps using some TFA instead of FA? "

Why do you use 10% MeCN? What is the pore size of the packings?

Also, there is hydrophobic interaction chrom. (HIC) which shows that some proteins need to be forced to adsorb to reverse phase surfaces.

I haven't see many proteins that are eluted in only 10% ACN at reverse phase conditions but I would start even lower just in case... and as Uwe is implying your protein might be excluded from the column if your pore size is too small...

“Excludedâ€
Learn Innovate and Share

Dancho Dikov

One can even have ion exclusion, the protein coming out ahead of tm (to). I have seen this with Mab on reverse phase during those trials where I unsuccessfully tried to do the Mab isocraticaly on C-18.

Thank you all for your feedback.

It looks like we're using a material with a 100 Angstrom pore size. BSA is about 70 kDa, do I need a 300 Angstrom pore size to retain this protein?

I'll suggest starting with a 5% ACN mobile phase to see if it has any effect.

You will avoid a lot of problems in the future if you use a 300 A material instead of the 100 A material.

We will pack the 300A material and give that a try. Also, we will experiment with a 5% ACN mobile phase. I'll followup with results ASAP.

Below is bovine serum albumin injected on to Intrada WP-RP (30nm pore size):
http://www.imtaktusa.com/site_media/fil ... TI289E.pdf

"I moved away from testing with BSA to my real samples. These proteins are more hydrophobic and hence I'm getting better results. I am using H2O/0.1% FA to load the samples and 90% ACN/5% FA to elute. This is giving me reasonably good results however with 5% FA my MS spray is not great (0.1% -1% FA results in much better spray and hence ionization)."
11 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 17 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 15 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], satya01 and 15 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry