Page 1 of 1

Different methods give the same result

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 5:35 pm
by melikekb
Hello,

I am working on cuticular waxes. I have been using GC-FID to find the compounds, but now I need GC-MS to define them. However, the columns are different. HP-1 column is used for GC-FID (Agilent 8860), while DB-1MS column is used for GC-MS (Agilent 8890 GC - 7010 B GC/TQ). The other column option I can use for the GC-MS is DB-5MS, but I was told that DB-1 and DB-5 are not too much different. Thus, I searched papers related to cuticular waxes in which one of those columns used, and load several methods, including my own method that I used on GC-FID. However, the results are all almost the same!!! I couldn't find what the problem is! I also tried two of my friends' methods although they test different things. One of them could give a baseline, but there is no peak I want to define. I attached a photo of the "common result" and the result done with my friend's method.

Could you please inform me what I can be doing wrong? Why do I get the same weird graph?

Please let me know if more information is needed to solve the problem.

The Common Result:
Image

The Result from Friend's Method:
Image

(The photos cannot be loaded here, but opening them in a new window after right click works)

Re: Different methods give the same result

Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:01 pm
by Peter Apps
The attachments will not open. If you analyse the same sample using different methods the results are supposed to be the same.

Re: Different methods give the same result

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2021 4:59 pm
by melikekb
Thanks, Peter.

The figures had a baseline with lots of bleeding. I have realized that the column is connected to the back inlet, but the software automatically chose the front inlet. As I am a new user, I couldn't see this problem by myself. Fortunately, it was an easy-to-solve problem.

Best.