Agilent .cdf files not opening in other software
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:28 am
We use Agilent's Chemstation (LC-MS) and are currently on version B-03-01 SR1. We'd like to use XCMS to process data, running in R for Windows.
XCMS requires .cdf or mzXML files. Agilent's built-in converter is giving us nightmares. Firstly, it can only convert files with 8 or less letters in their name, although the newer versions of Chemstation, when using prefix+number file naming, will only produce filenames with 9 or more letters, so we have to change all the file names before the converter will work.
Secondly, once we've done this, XCMS crashes when we open the Agilent cdf files ("The R for windows GUI has encountered a problem and has to close"). XCMS in R for windows will open cdf files generated on other instruments.
I'm scared that the developers of XCMS and Chemstation may be at cross-purposes in their understanding of cdf format, and we'll get caught up between two groups of people declaring the other to be at fault, or they'll both tell me (politely) I'm too stupid to use XCMS, which is quite possibly true.
Has anyone else encountered this problem? We'd be very grateful if anyone knows a way round it.
XCMS requires .cdf or mzXML files. Agilent's built-in converter is giving us nightmares. Firstly, it can only convert files with 8 or less letters in their name, although the newer versions of Chemstation, when using prefix+number file naming, will only produce filenames with 9 or more letters, so we have to change all the file names before the converter will work.
Secondly, once we've done this, XCMS crashes when we open the Agilent cdf files ("The R for windows GUI has encountered a problem and has to close"). XCMS in R for windows will open cdf files generated on other instruments.
I'm scared that the developers of XCMS and Chemstation may be at cross-purposes in their understanding of cdf format, and we'll get caught up between two groups of people declaring the other to be at fault, or they'll both tell me (politely) I'm too stupid to use XCMS, which is quite possibly true.
Has anyone else encountered this problem? We'd be very grateful if anyone knows a way round it.