by
freemab » Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:17 pm
Actually, it sometimes happens that the presence of a constant level of a component, such as BHT, does NOT interfere with the detection of that component in the sample. So the first thing to do is see whether it's really a problem. The background signal would be the main problem, I would think.
Fresh THF without preservatives is generally clean of peroxides, but the test strips are a good way of double checking. Once opened, peroxides start forming immediately, unless you exhaustively purge out the air.
However, any preservative that intercepts the oxygen faster than the THF might be suitable instead of BHT. Perhaps hydroquinone or another phenolic that happens not to interfere with your assay could work.
I'm a little out of my field here, but it's my understanding that water and perhaps alcohols can also impede the formation of peroxides. Might be worth looking into.
I recall some years ago doing some work with unstabilized BHT in which I placed cobalt sulfate- (?) treated molecular sieve in the THF bottle to stabilize the THF against peroxides. My memory of this is foggy. I believe I never got so far as instituting such a procedure in a method. I vaguely recall using a material from Fluka, perhaps 69828, because all other suppliers use cobalt chloride as indicator and this compound is soluble in ethers.
Should it be necessary, it is possible to clean THF of peroxides using basic alumina. I believe Fieser and Fieser gives a procedure (for ethers, generally). However, if you do this, be aware that the alumina will now contain peroxides, and it is necessary to reduce these before allowing the alumina to dry. I believe I used KI, which visibly is converted to iodine, to do this.
Another thing to consider is to avoid using THF at all, especially if it's acetonitrile you're trying to replace. Look on Snyder's solvent triangle for something more like acetonitrile than THF. If that doesn't work, consider using methyl-t-butyl ether instead of THF, as MTBE does not form peroxides.