FYI - Eksigent has released multiple HPLC systems optimized specifically for small columns, precise 'low' flowrates optimized for those columns, with direct pumping and no flow splitting.... it's about as green you can get in HPLC. No to mention improved retention time reproducibility and improved sensitivity... what's not to like?
Sure, you'll have to spend a few dollars on a new LC, but you'll make up the cost in solvent savings in a year!
The solvent shortage issue should be seen by lab managers as yet another reason to modernize their lab equipment and implement 'greener' practices in general...
Assuming 1 ml/min of 100% CH3CN, 24/7/365.25 = 526 litres/year
But 150 - 200 litre is my current annual requirement for each analytical HPLC. My last price for gradient grade, low UV CH3CN was US$17.20/L, and I could obtain it for lower than that if I was ordering 100 Litre at a time..
525 litres would cost US$9,050, and waste solvent disposal cost is $0.50/litre. Simple HPLCs start at about $35,000, and a UPLC is about $65,000 in NZ.
I've no idea which is greener, using a solvent-guzzling more mature HPLC until support ceases, or investing in a young pristine solvent-sipping hunk of plastic, Al, SS, with associated computers etc that required serious energy/resources to produce.
However, I know which option my bank manager and accountant are going to support after viewing the above data.
A little evangelism lurks around this thread.
Bruce Hamilton