-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:35 pm
I have been researching your suggested approach all morning, but have once again come up empty handed for similar applications. I guess my real question is this: with any of these methodologies, we are not really concerned so much with the sugar portion of the structure as we are with the anionic sulfate groups . . . is that correct?
Bryan,
Looks like this buffer will result in a pH around 7.0. As I stated, I've worked over the entire range (even 7.0) but have not seen a difference in resolution. Is there something about THIS buffer that might effect the specificity of the separation?b). Mobile phase conditions. Did you also try the TEA acetate?
This is volatile & compatible with ELSD
When you say you are SURE SAX will separate these compounds, what makes you say that? I did attempt a separation on a PRP-X100 which resulted in the same co-elution. I DO have conductivity and RI detectors at my disposal, so if that helps ... I just don't have any experience with the conductivity detector, so I would have to figure that out too. Same for the ligand-exchange option, I guess.c). SAX - I don't think this is a good option. The reason is because
you're limited as far as what mobile phase you can use (volatile).
I'm sure SAX will separate these compounds -
but you'll need a different detector.
I will send you some chromatograms shortly, but I don't really think they will be much help. Thanks for your advice.
