-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 12:26 pm
Everyone agrees that ammonium sulfate is a good protein precipitant. Sulfate is strongly hydrated and thus should tie up enough water to render the protein insufficiently solvated to stay in solution. However, the ammonium ion is relatively weakly hydrated according to my data, and less hydrated for example than the sodium ion. In this case, sodium sulfate should be a better protein precipitant, but it is not. Can you explain this? I am not sure about the TCA example that you gave. I thought TCA denatured proteins and caused their precipitation-one of the reasons for this is the low pH of TCA. Is this not different from the case of precipitation without denaturation as with ammonium sulfate? If I remember, the original 1890 Hofmeister series did not take pH effects into account, but the "amended" version does.
Chris- I would be extremely grateful if you could also answer my question on the point you raised about WAX chromatograpy. You said that highly hydrated ions have less retention. Can you explain this more fully? Are you suggesting this is some sort of size exclusion effect where the hydrated ions cannot enter the pores of the resin? Or is there some other reason like the increased distance between point charges caused by the hydration of the solute ion and its effect on Coulombic attraction?
